Slashdot Submission, A second Interstellar object?

In the aftermath of the recognition of 1I/`Oumuamua as an object originating from outside the Solar system, people have been trawling through the archives for other possible similar events. One such archive is CNEOS, which incororates a list of fireballs - objects that have hit the Earth's atmosphere such as the 2013 Chelyabinsk meteor, or the powerful event over Russian Kamchatka in December of last year.
Searching this database a small event (about 100tons TNT equivalent) of 2014 stood out - the orientation of it's path, time and date allowed it's trajectory to be worked out and back-tracked, showing that it probably came to Earth from outside the Solar system. Before entering the Solar system, the object had a velocity of some 43.8km/s with respect to the Sun and was slightly accelerated by the Earth's gravity before impact. When compared to the "Local Standard of Rest" (LSR, the vector of objects orbiting the galactic centre with the Sun), the object's computed speed was some 60km/s, and at This implies that it was never bound to the Sun. Unlike 1I/`Oumuamua, the bolide was also at a considerable angle to the LSR. If accepted as an interstellar object, this second such body starts to flesh out the size and frequency distribution of such events. The possible power-law distributions within these limits are compatible with the distribution of small Kuiper Belt Objects, which includes objects liable to be scattered from the Solar system in future stellar encounters.
The location of the fireball - above the Pacific Ocean NE of Papua New Guinea does not make finding remains very likely. However, the last word of the paper's Discussion is "panspermia" so "Aliens" graphics can be used.

I need to do a bathymetry for this one too.

Put onto Slashdot as a submission.

I've done the bathymetry. The red star shows the location of the fireball ; the white line is the line of the profile.

Data is from GMRT and CNEOS, plotted using www.GeoMapApp.org.

Pleistocene Indonesian bathymetry

With the recent announcement of another quite old, non-human hominoid in SE Asia, once again people are asking questions about how such humanoids got there, as if these non-human animals were stupid, or incompetent, or ... whatever reason.
So, I did a bit of bathymetry work, since I've got tools to hand. I'm sure I'll use these again.
The common estimate for the decrease in sea level (compared to today) at the height of the last ice age, is 100m, so I've adjusted the rainbow colour scale to cover the 90-110m range ; anything deeper than that is marked in blue ; anything shallower is white ; present day exposed land is given an altitude palette.

Is Luzon isolated from the mainland by deep water? 

On this first plot, there is an obvious wide gap to the north. It actually goes down to several km depth, but since you normally drown in the top few metres of water, that doesn't really matter. The minimum sea passage is several hundred kilometres. That's quite a challenge.

 Moving to the southern approach, the question is more complex. At a 100m lower sea level, there is no "dry" route to Luzon, but several of the channels are down in the few-tens of km width. These would certainly be easier for people to have crossed, regardless of their species. Whether that is how the Luzon hominids got in ... is at the moment a judgement call. But if I were looking for places to search for bone-bearing deposits, that's where I'd start. 

This next picture I just anticipate I'll need at some point. Constructed from the same data (GMRT) and with the same shading to differentiate 100m+ versus 100m- water depths, it shows the context of the Homo Floresiensis discovery site (Liang bua cave, my typo). You will note that at least one water crossing of about 30km or larger is needed to get from mainland Asia to Liang bua.
The sea to the north of the two Nusa islands is known as the Flores Sea, for which the species was named.

Plots done using GeoMapApp, www.geomapapp.org and the GMRT dataset they pick up.